Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Can we re-set the re-set button ???

Looks like relations with Russians haven't gotten all warm and fuzzy. We threw Eastern Europe under the bus (again) by unilaterally discarding an anti-missile shield. And what do we get ??

Cooperation on Iran?? Nope.
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin warned major powers on Wednesday against intimidating Iran and said talk of sanctions against the Islamic Republic over its nuclear programme was "premature".

Putin, who many diplomats, analysts, and Russian citizens believe is still Russia's paramount leader despite stepping down as president last year, was speaking after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Moscow for two days of talks.

"There is no need to frighten the Iranians," Putin told reporters in Beijing after a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.

"We need to look for a compromise. If a compromise is not found, and the discussions end in a fiasco, then we will see."

"And if now, before making any steps (towards holding talks) we start announcing some sanctions, then we won't be creating favourable conditions for them (talks) to end positively. This is why it is premature to talk about this now."

Clinton failed to secure any specific assurances from Russia on Iran during her visit, leaving her open to criticism at home that she had not received anything from Moscow after earlier U.S. concessions on missile defence.

What we do get is a Russian warning that they have no qualms about a pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons
A top Russian security official says Moscow reserves the right to conduct pre-emptive nuclear strikes to safeguard the country against aggression on both a large and a local scale, according to a newspaper interview published Wednesday.

Presidential Security Council chief Nikolai Patrushev also singled out the U.S. and NATO, saying Moscow's Cold War foes still pose potential threats to Russia despite what he called a global trend toward local conflicts.

The interview appeared in the daily Izvestia during a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, as U.S. and Russian negotiators try to hammer out a nuclear arms reduction treaty by December. It also came amid grumbling in Moscow over U.S. moves to modify plans for a missile shield near Russia's borders rather than ditch the idea outright.

Patrushev said a sweeping document on military policy including a passage on preventative nuclear force will be handed to President Dmitry Medvedev by the end of the year, according to Izvestia.

Officials are examining "a variety of possibilities for using nuclear force, depending on the situation and the intentions of the possible opponent," Patrushev was quoted as saying. "In situations critical to national security, options including a preventative nuclear strike on the aggressor are not excluded."

It seems that Russians aren't awed by Obama's Nobel prize or his vision of ridding the world of nuclear weapons. In fact, it seems that they interpret these unilateral concessions as signs of weakness. Who would have ever imagined ???

Also, while both articles reference Clinton, (and she does deserve some of the hit as Sec State) make no mistake, these are boy-genius' policies.

So, this is "smart diplomacy" ?? Boy good thing we don't have the dumb cowboy or the Alaskan chillbilly in office. They would only muck it up. Sheesh!

2 comments:

  1. I like the fact that Putin stressed that Russia was promised that there would be no missile shield for Eastern Europe. Apparently he didn't get the "smarter, faster more capable" memo that the Great Leader read to the US.


    Lazy Libertarian

    ReplyDelete
  2. "To protect against Moscow's Cold War foes"??!!!! Ya gotta be kidding me!!!!


    Lazy Libertarian

    ReplyDelete

Powered By Blogger